Employee Clock-In Systems: Complete Guide for 2026

Employee using an NFC and QR clock-in system at a workplace entrance

Employee Clock-In Systems: Complete Guide for 2026

The workplace clock has changed shape several times.

First came the paper register.

Then the punch card.

Then magnetic cards, proximity fobs, fingerprint readers and facial-recognition terminals.

More recently, businesses have moved towards employee apps, GPS clock-ins, QR codes and NFC.

Yet the question behind all of these systems has barely changed:

Who arrived, when did they arrive, where did they arrive — and when did they leave?

For some businesses, that information feeds directly into payroll.

For others, the priority is simpler: knowing who is currently on site, keeping a reliable attendance record and avoiding paper sign-in sheets spread across multiple entrances or locations.

Those are not necessarily the same requirement.

And that distinction matters when choosing an employee clock-in system.

A restaurant with 12 employees needs something different from a construction company operating 20 sites. A hotel may need to record employees, contractors and temporary workers. A large field-service business may care about GPS routes, shift scheduling and payroll integrations. An office may simply want a reliable answer to: who is in the building right now?

This guide explains the main clock-in technologies available in 2026, where each works well, where it does not, and what to look for before committing to a system.


What Is an Employee Clock-In System?

An employee clock-in system is a method of recording when an employee begins and ends work or arrives at and leaves a workplace.

Depending on the system, it may also record location, breaks, working hours, job or site information, photographs, attendance history and data used for timesheets or payroll.

Modern systems can use dedicated terminals, cards, biometrics, smartphones, apps, web browsers, QR codes or NFC.

The important point is that “clock-in system” is now a category, not a single type of machine.


How Does an Employee Clock-In System Work?

Every clock-in system has three basic components:

1. Identity
Who is performing the action?

2. Event
Are they checking in, checking out or recording another attendance event?

3. Timestamp
When did it happen?

More advanced systems add:

  • location
  • employee number
  • department
  • site
  • job
  • break information
  • photos
  • GPS data
  • device data
  • payroll rules
  • schedules
  • overtime
  • absence information

The employee interaction may take only seconds.

What happens behind it varies significantly.

A traditional punch clock physically stamps a card.

A biometric terminal associates a fingerprint or face template with an employee.

An app records the event against a logged-in user.

An NFC system can use a fixed physical Check-In Point to direct a smartphone into a digital attendance workflow.

The best approach depends on what information the organisation actually needs.


What Does a Clock-In System Record?

At minimum, most systems record:

Employee identity
Date
Clock-in time
Clock-out time

From there, functionality diverges.

A comprehensive time-and-attendance platform may calculate hours worked, breaks, overtime and payroll-ready timesheets.

For example, Time Point currently positions its time-and-attendance platform around start, end and break times, payroll-ready timesheets, absence management, scheduling and compliance rules.

Connecteam goes further into workforce management, combining its clock with GPS, geofencing, timesheets, scheduling, forms and payroll integrations.

Other organisations do not need all of that.

They may primarily want:

  • who is on site now
  • arrival and departure history
  • which location somebody attended
  • staff, contractor and visitor records
  • searchable attendance data
  • exports
  • multi-location visibility

Choosing software becomes much easier once that distinction is clear.


The Main Types of Employee Clock-In Systems

1. Paper Sign-In Sheets

The simplest system is still a sheet of paper.

A person writes their name and arrival time, then adds their departure time when leaving.

Its advantages are obvious:

It is cheap.

It requires almost no training.

It does not need electricity or software.

Its limitations are equally obvious.

Handwriting can be unclear.

People forget to sign out.

Records need to be stored.

Searching historical information is manual.

Multiple sites create multiple sets of paperwork.

And if everyone signs the same sheet, previous entries may be visible to the next person using it.

For very small environments, paper can still work.

But the moment an organisation wants searchable records or live attendance visibility, its weaknesses become more significant.


2. Punch Clocks and Card-Based Time Clocks

Punch clocks industrialised attendance.

Employees insert a card or use an assigned credential to register arrival and departure.

Modern versions may use magnetic cards, RFID cards or key fobs rather than literal stamped paper.

Card and fob systems remain attractive in high-volume environments because the interaction is fast and familiar.

Time Point, for example, currently offers proximity-card and fob terminals designed for high-traffic workplaces such as manufacturing, healthcare, retail, hospitality and logistics.

The disadvantage is infrastructure.

The organisation needs a terminal.

Employees need assigned credentials.

Lost cards need replacing.

Multiple entrances may require multiple readers.

For a factory with thousands of fixed employees, that may be entirely reasonable.

For an office that simply wants digital check-in at two doors, it may be more infrastructure than necessary.


3. Biometric Clocking Systems

Biometric systems identify an employee using physical characteristics such as:

  • fingerprints
  • facial characteristics

Their key advantage is identity assurance.

A physical credential can be passed to another person. A fingerprint is harder to share.

That makes biometrics useful where “buddy punching” — one employee clocking in for another — is a significant concern.

Time Point currently offers both facial-recognition and fingerprint clocking as part of its hardware range.

But there is a trade-off.

Biometric systems generally involve more specialised hardware, onboarding and more sensitive privacy considerations than a basic timestamped attendance system.

Biometric data used for uniquely identifying an individual receives special protection under GDPR.

That does not mean biometric attendance systems are automatically inappropriate.

It does mean organisations should have a clear reason for using them rather than choosing biometrics simply because the hardware looks advanced.


4. Employee Clock-In Apps

Mobile apps have become one of the dominant alternatives to wall-mounted machines.

Employees install an app, sign in and clock in or out from their smartphone.

This approach can work particularly well for:

  • field workers
  • mobile teams
  • remote workers
  • distributed teams
  • businesses that also want schedules, messaging and HR tools

BrightHR's Blip, for example, supports employee clock-ins through its app, geofences and QR codes, as well as web-based clocking.

Connecteam combines mobile clocking with GPS, geofencing, timesheets, job tracking, scheduling and payroll workflows.

The obvious disadvantage is the requirement to onboard employees into software.

That may be trivial for permanent staff.

It can be less appealing for:

  • contractors
  • temporary workers
  • occasional visitors
  • suppliers
  • people who do not want another workplace app on a personal device

So the app model is powerful, but it is not universally the lowest-friction option.


5. Shared Kiosk Systems

A kiosk allows several employees to use one shared device.

Usually that means a tablet installed at a fixed location.

Employees may enter:

  • a PIN
  • employee ID
  • password
  • other credential

Connecteam currently offers a dedicated kiosk app that lets employees clock in from a shared device using individual codes, with optional selfie verification.

This is particularly useful when:

  • personal phones are not permitted
  • not everyone has a suitable smartphone
  • the business wants one controlled clocking station

The trade-off is obvious: the company still has to purchase, mount, power, connect and maintain the shared device.


6. Browser-Based Clock-In

A browser-based system removes the need for an installed app.

Instead, the employee opens a web page and submits attendance through their phone or computer.

Time Point offers desktop clocking where users can clock in through a browser using credentials.

TAPiTAG takes a different approach: the browser-based Check-In workflow is opened by interacting with a physical NFC + QR Check-In Point.

That means the employee does not have to remember a URL or locate an app.

The physical location becomes the entry point.


7. QR Code Staff Check-In

A QR attendance system places a code at an entrance or workplace.

The employee scans it with their smartphone.

The QR code then opens either:

  • a web page
  • an app
  • an attendance workflow

BrightHR supports QR-based clock-ins, although its workflow uses the Blip app.

QR's strengths are familiarity and compatibility.

Most smartphone users know how to scan a QR code.

QR codes are also inexpensive to produce.

Their weakness is that the user must deliberately open the camera and scan the code.

That is hardly a major obstacle, but NFC can make the interaction even more direct.


8. NFC Employee Check-In

NFC stands for Near Field Communication.

In an employee attendance context, a fixed NFC Check-In Point can trigger an interaction when a compatible smartphone is brought close to it.

Instead of inserting a card into a machine, the employee can use the phone already in their hand.

Connecteam now lists NFC as one of several clock-in methods alongside its mobile app, kiosk app and physical clock integrations.

TAPiTAG's Check-In platform is built specifically around physical NFC + QR Check-In Points.

Staff, visitors and contractors tap or scan, complete the relevant Check-In or Check-Out interaction in the browser, and the resulting attendance record appears in the dashboard. TAPiTAG's current platform supports live on-site visibility, multi-location management, searchable attendance history and exports.


NFC vs QR vs App vs Terminal: Quick Comparison

Method Dedicated Hardware Employee App Identity Assurance Multi-Site Flexibility Often Best For
Paper sheet No No Low Low Very small/simple environments
Punch/card clock Yes No Medium Medium Fixed high-volume workforces
RFID/fob Yes No Medium Medium Warehouses, manufacturing
Biometric Yes No High Medium High identity-verification needs
Mobile app No dedicated terminal Usually yes Medium High Mobile/field workforces
Shared kiosk Tablet/device Often software required Medium–high Medium Fixed central clock-in station
QR Minimal Depends on platform Low–medium High Low-cost digital check-in
NFC NFC point Depends on platform Low–medium High Fast fixed-location interaction
NFC + QR browser-based Minimal No dedicated employee app Low–medium High Offices, visitors, contractors, multi-site attendance

There is no universally superior row in this table.

A system should be judged against the organisation's actual operational requirements.


Employee Clock-In System vs Time Clock vs Attendance System

These phrases are often used interchangeably, but there are useful distinctions.

Time Clock

Usually focuses on working time.

It may calculate:

  • paid hours
  • breaks
  • overtime
  • timesheets
  • payroll inputs

Clock-In System

Usually refers to the mechanism used to register arrival or starting work.

Attendance System

Can be broader.

It may answer:

  • who is present?
  • where are they?
  • when did they arrive?
  • when did they leave?
  • which location did they attend?
  • what attendance history exists?

A product can be all three.

But not every attendance platform is designed to become a complete payroll time clock.

That distinction should be made before buying.


Do Employees Need an App to Clock In?

No. Modern employee clock-in systems can use apps, browsers, shared terminals, NFC, QR codes or combinations of these technologies.

Apps make sense when the employee needs wider workforce functionality.

For example, Connecteam uses its mobile app for clocking alongside scheduling, timesheets, communications and other workforce tools.

Time Point's app also covers schedules, GPS clocking, holiday requests, documents and employee information.

That breadth is useful.

But if the only required employee action is:

Arrive → Check In → Leave → Check Out

an installed app may not always be necessary.

TAPiTAG's current Check-In system uses NFC and QR to open a browser-based workflow, so the individual checking in does not need to install a TAPiTAG app.

This can be particularly useful when contractors or visitors need to use the same system as permanent employees.


Do You Need a Dedicated Clocking-In Machine?

Not necessarily.

Dedicated clocking machines remain appropriate when organisations need:

  • high-volume central clocking
  • biometric identity verification
  • card/fob authentication
  • a device controlled entirely by the company
  • environments where personal phones cannot be used

But modern smartphones can themselves become part of the attendance infrastructure.

A fixed NFC or QR Check-In Point tells the phone:

This is where the attendance interaction starts.

That removes the need for a powered terminal at every entrance.

TAPiTAG's current system specifically positions itself around this model: NFC + QR physical Check-In Points, the user's smartphone and a central dashboard, without installing tablets or specialist attendance readers at each entrance.


What Is an NFC Time Clock?

An NFC time clock uses Near Field Communication to trigger or record an employee's clock-in or clock-out interaction when they tap an NFC-enabled device or credential against a compatible endpoint.

There are several ways NFC can be implemented.

An employee may tap:

  • an NFC card on a reader
  • an NFC phone on a fixed tag
  • a tag that opens an attendance app
  • a tag that opens a browser workflow

That is why two products described as “NFC time clocks” can work very differently.

Always look at the workflow behind the NFC interaction rather than focusing only on the presence of the technology.


NFC vs QR Employee Check-In

For most businesses, this is not really an either/or decision.

NFC

The employee places a compatible smartphone close to the Check-In Point.

The main advantage is speed.

Tap → open → check in.

QR

The employee opens the camera and scans.

The advantage is familiarity and broad compatibility.

NFC + QR

Combining both allows the same physical Check-In Point to serve two behaviours.

That is the model TAPiTAG uses.

If someone prefers NFC, they tap.

If they prefer QR, they scan.

Both reach the same attendance workflow.


Can You See Who Is Currently On Site?

A good digital attendance system can do more than keep historical times.

It can provide a live operational view.

That matters because there is an important difference between:

“Mark checked in at 08:15.”

and:

“Mark is currently recorded as on site.”

TAPiTAG's current dashboard includes a live Who's On Site view that shows current attendance and location information, alongside arrival/departure activity and history.

BrightHR similarly provides a real-time “Who's in” view within its clocking system.

Connecteam also focuses heavily on real-time workforce visibility, including location where GPS features are enabled.

This is increasingly one of the most useful differences between a digital attendance system and a static sign-in sheet.


What Should an Attendance Dashboard Show?

Not every dashboard needs 100 widgets.

A useful workplace attendance dashboard should answer practical questions quickly.

Who is on site now?

This should be prominent.

Managers should not need to export a report to find the current headcount.

Where are they?

For multiple locations, the system should distinguish between sites.

When did they arrive?

The check-in time provides operational context.

How long have they been on site?

This can help surface missed check-outs.

Who arrived or left today?

A live or recent activity feed makes the system easier to understand at a glance.

What happened historically?

Managers should be able to search prior check-in and check-out activity.

Can records be filtered?

Useful filters include:

  • date
  • person
  • email
  • location
  • check-in/check-out type

Can records be exported?

Sometimes the dashboard is not the final destination.

Exports allow attendance information to be used elsewhere.

TAPiTAG's current system includes live on-site status, recent attendance activity, searchable check-in/out history, multi-location records and export functionality.

It also highlights unusually long active check-ins that may indicate someone forgot to check out.


How Does Multi-Site Employee Attendance Work?

Imagine an organisation with:

Head Office
Warehouse
London Office
Construction Site

Each of these is a location.

But each location may contain more than one Check-In Point.

For example:

Head Office

  • Main reception
  • Staff entrance
  • Delivery entrance

Warehouse

  • Warehouse staff door
  • Contractor entrance

That is an important distinction.

A location describes the workplace.

A Check-In Point describes the physical interaction point where someone records attendance.

A scalable system should allow multiple Check-In Points to feed information into one central management environment.

TAPiTAG's current platform supports Check-In Points across offices, warehouses, departments and individual sites from the same dashboard.


Employee Clock-In Systems and GDPR

Employee attendance data deserves careful treatment.

A record showing that a named person arrived at a specific workplace at a specific time is personal data.

Add location, photographs or persistent tracking and the privacy considerations become more significant.

The European Commission summarises several core GDPR principles organisations should apply when processing personal data, including lawfulness and transparency, purpose limitation, data minimisation, accuracy, storage limitation and appropriate security.

For an attendance system, that means asking practical questions.

Why are we collecting this information?

The purpose should be defined.

Attendance?

Security?

Working time?

Contractor records?

Payroll?

Avoid collecting information simply because the software makes it possible.

Are employees informed?

People should understand what information is being collected and why.

How much data is necessary?

If a timestamp is sufficient, collecting continuous GPS routes may be excessive for that particular purpose.

If the business needs stronger location assurance, then there may be a legitimate reason for a more location-intensive system.

The point is proportionality.

How long will records be kept?

Do not retain personal data indefinitely without purpose.

Who can access it?

Attendance dashboards should be restricted to authorised people.

What about photographs?

A simple check-in photograph and biometric facial-recognition template are not necessarily the same thing.

A photograph can still be personal data.

Biometric processing used to uniquely identify a person can fall into a more sensitive GDPR category.

Organisations should understand the difference.

TAPiTAG supports optional check-in photo capture, but it should be described as a visual attendance record rather than facial recognition or biometric identity verification.

This article is not legal advice. Organisations with complex workforce-monitoring requirements should obtain appropriate privacy and employment-law guidance.


Clock-In App vs NFC + QR Check-In

Neither approach wins every use case.

An app may be better when you need:

  • shift scheduling
  • payroll integrations
  • employee messaging
  • holiday requests
  • overtime rules
  • GPS route tracking
  • mobile workforce management
  • employee self-service

Connecteam is a good example of this broader model. Its current Operations product combines Time Clock with job scheduling, forms and tasks, while higher tiers expand geofencing and automation.

BrightHR and Time Point similarly combine clocking with wider HR or workforce functionality.

NFC + QR may be better when you prioritise:

  • a fixed physical Check-In Point
  • no employee app
  • staff + visitors + contractors
  • fast rollout
  • live on-site attendance
  • multiple entrances
  • multiple locations
  • minimal electronic hardware

That is where TAPiTAG's model is strongest.

It is not attempting to replace full HR software.

It is attempting to make physical workplace check-in simpler.


Biometric Clocking vs NFC

Biometric systems and NFC systems solve different problems.

Biometric systems

Strengths

  • stronger identity verification
  • less opportunity to share credentials
  • suitable for tightly controlled environments

Considerations

  • dedicated hardware
  • employee enrolment
  • more sensitive privacy implications
  • potentially higher deployment complexity

NFC + smartphone

Strengths

  • low-friction deployment
  • can use existing smartphones
  • no biometric enrolment
  • easy to distribute across locations
  • physical Check-In Point remains obvious

Considerations

  • does not automatically provide biometric identity assurance
  • relies on smartphone availability
  • identity verification depends on the workflow

If preventing one employee from ever checking in for another is the overriding priority, biometric or PIN-based systems may be more appropriate.

If ease of deployment and simple workplace visibility matter more, NFC + QR can be attractive.


How Much Does an Employee Clock-In System Cost?

Pricing models vary almost as much as the technology.

Per-user subscriptions

Common in workforce-management software.

The cost grows with employee count.

Company or plan subscriptions

A fixed base price includes a certain number of users, with additional charges beyond that.

Connecteam's Operations pricing, at the time of writing in August 2026, starts at $29/month billed yearly for the first 30 users, with Advanced at $49/month and Expert at $99/month. Monthly billing costs more.

That pricing should be understood in context: Connecteam includes much more than basic attendance.

Hardware + software

Some systems charge for physical terminals and also for ongoing software.

That is common where biometric readers, tablet clocks or card readers are installed.

Per-location or deployment pricing

Some solutions are priced around sites rather than individual employees.

Hardware + annual software

TAPiTAG uses a simpler hardware-plus-software structure.

For the current single Check-In Point package, the first-year cost is:

€35 one-time Check-In Point hardware + €99 annual Check-In software = €134 first year.

The software renews at €99/year after the first year.

Larger plans cover additional Check-In Points.

Because TAPiTAG is not a full payroll or HR suite, the fairest comparison is not simply “which monthly number is lower?”

The real question is:

Which functionality are you actually buying?


Best Employee Clock-In System by Workplace Type

Small Office

A simple NFC + QR Check-In Point can be ideal where the organisation mainly wants arrival/departure records and live attendance.

A full workforce suite may be unnecessary.

Hotel

Hotels have multiple departments and a mixture of employees, contractors and temporary workers.

Multiple Check-In Points may make sense at staff entrances, back-of-house areas or separate properties.

If rostering and payroll optimisation are central requirements, a fuller workforce-management platform may be preferable.

Warehouse

Warehouses often benefit from clearly defined entry points.

RFID, kiosk and biometric systems remain sensible for high-volume shift changes.

NFC + QR can be attractive when the priority is lighter hardware and smartphone interaction.

Construction

Construction presents additional complexity:

  • temporary workers
  • subcontractors
  • changing sites
  • site-specific records

An NFC + QR solution can make fixed site Check-In Points easy to deploy.

Businesses requiring continuous worker location or sophisticated timekeeping may prefer GPS/geofencing tools.

Retail

Smaller stores may need a straightforward staff clock-in.

Multi-store operators may value centralised location visibility.

Facilities Management

This is particularly well suited to location-specific check-ins.

Staff or contractors may attend many customer sites.

Each site can have its own Check-In Point.

Multi-Site Organisations

Prioritise:

  • location management
  • central dashboard
  • easy rollout
  • scalable hardware
  • searchable history

Visitor- and Contractor-Heavy Workplaces

Avoid assuming everyone can be onboarded into an employee app.

A browser-based NFC/QR interaction can dramatically reduce friction for occasional users.


See How TAPiTAG Check-In Works

The workflow is intentionally simple.

A staff member arrives at the workplace.

They walk to the entrance.

They tap the TAPiTAG Check-In Point with their phone.

The Check-In page opens.

They complete their check-in.

They walk inside.

That exact journey is shown in TAPiTAG's original demonstration video:

The value of the video is not that it explains every dashboard feature.

It does something more important.

It shows how little the employee has to learn.


Where TAPiTAG Fits

TAPiTAG Check-In is best understood as a physical-to-digital workplace attendance system.

A branded NFC + QR Check-In Point sits where people arrive.

The smartphone opens the workflow.

The dashboard holds the attendance record.

The current platform supports:

  • staff check-in
  • visitor check-in
  • contractor check-in
  • NFC + QR
  • no dedicated employee app
  • live Who's On Site view
  • check-in/check-out history
  • multi-location management
  • optional photo capture
  • filtering and searching
  • exports
  • unusually long active check-in alerts
  • multiple physical Check-In formats

That makes it particularly relevant to organisations that want to replace paper attendance or simple clock-in processes without installing a powered attendance terminal at every entrance.

Explore TAPiTAG Check-In & Check-Out

View TAPiTAG Check-In plans and hardware

But the distinction is important:

If you need a complete HR platform with payroll calculations, complex scheduling, holiday management, employee messaging, GPS route tracking and advanced workforce planning, a broader platform such as Connecteam, BrightHR or Time Point may better match that requirement.

Choosing less software when you need more is a mistake.

So is buying more infrastructure than the problem requires.


Employee Clock-In System Buyer Checklist

Before selecting a system, ask:

What are we actually trying to record?
Working hours, presence, site attendance or all three?

Who needs to use it?
Employees only, or also contractors and visitors?

Do we need payroll integration?

Do we need shift scheduling?

Do employees need to use personal smartphones?

Do we want them to install an app?

Do we require biometric identity assurance?

Do we need GPS or geofencing?

Do we need to know who's currently on site?

How many locations do we operate?

How many Check-In Points could each location require?

Can records be searched and exported?

What personal data is being collected?

How long will we retain it?

How quickly can new locations be deployed?

What happens when someone forgets to clock out?

If you can answer those questions, comparing products becomes significantly easier.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is an employee clock-in system?

An employee clock-in system records when employees begin and end work or arrive at and leave a workplace. Modern systems may use apps, NFC, QR codes, biometrics, cards, terminals or web browsers.

What is the best way for employees to clock in?

There is no universal best method. Apps suit mobile workforces, biometrics suit stronger identity verification, and NFC + QR can be particularly useful for simple fixed-location check-in without dedicated terminals.

Can employees clock in with their phones?

Yes. Smartphones can clock employees in using apps, web pages, GPS, QR codes or NFC depending on the attendance system.

Can staff clock in without downloading an app?

Yes. Browser-based systems such as TAPiTAG can open through an NFC tap or QR scan without requiring the individual checking in to install a dedicated employee app.

What is an NFC time clock?

An NFC time clock uses Near Field Communication as part of the clock-in process. An employee may tap a phone, card or NFC credential against a compatible tag or reader to begin or record the attendance interaction.

Is NFC better than QR?

Neither is universally better. NFC offers a very fast tap interaction, while QR is familiar and broadly accessible. Combining both gives users a choice.

Do I need a clocking-in machine?

No. Dedicated clocking machines remain useful in some workplaces, but smartphone-based NFC, QR and app systems can record attendance without a traditional wall-mounted time clock.

Can an attendance system show who is currently on site?

Yes. Systems with live attendance dashboards can identify users currently recorded as checked in. TAPiTAG, BrightHR and other modern platforms include versions of this capability.

Can one attendance system manage multiple locations?

Yes. Modern platforms commonly allow attendance to be associated with separate sites, departments or locations. TAPiTAG can deploy multiple physical Check-In Points across separate locations while managing records centrally.

Are employee clock-in systems GDPR compliant?

GDPR compliance depends on how the organisation configures and uses the system, what information it collects, its lawful basis, transparency, retention and security. A product cannot remove the organisation's own data-protection responsibilities.

How much does an employee clock-in system cost?

Costs range from low-cost QR or browser systems to monthly per-user workforce software and higher-cost biometric or terminal deployments. Compare total hardware, software and administrative costs rather than subscription price alone.

What is the difference between a time clock and an attendance system?

A time clock primarily records working time, often for timesheets or payroll. An attendance system may focus more broadly on who is present, where they checked in and their arrival/departure history. Many products combine both functions.


The Best Clock-In System Is the One That Fits the Job

There is a temptation in workplace software to assume more features always mean a better product.

They do not.

They mean a broader product.

A 500-person mobile workforce may genuinely need schedules, GPS, payroll automation, overtime rules and employee communications.

A warehouse may need a robust RFID or biometric clock.

A ten-person office may simply want to replace the clipboard at reception.

And a multi-location organisation may want something in between: physical Check-In Points, no employee app, live attendance and central records.

The right question is therefore not:

“What is the most advanced employee clock-in system?”

It is:

“What is the simplest system that reliably gives our organisation the information it actually needs?”

For organisations where that answer is tap or scan, see who's on site, keep the history and manage several locations, TAPiTAG Check-In is designed specifically around that workflow.

Explore TAPiTAG Check-In

Shop our collections

Required fields are marked with *.